By Georgina M. Montgomery
A better half to the background of yankee Science bargains a suite of essays that provide an authoritative evaluation of the newest scholarship at the background of yankee science.
- Covers themes together with astronomy, agriculture, chemistry, eugenics, substantial technology, army expertise, and more
- Features contributions by way of the main entire students within the box of technological know-how history
- Covers pivotal occasions in U.S. historical past that formed the improvement of technological know-how and technology coverage comparable to WWII, the chilly struggle, and the Women’s Rights movement
Read or Download A Companion to the History of American Science PDF
Best history & philosophy books
Advent. - arithmetic and Mathematicians. - the character of Mathematical difficulties. - items and strategies in Classical arithmetic. - Appendix. - a few difficulties of Classical arithmetic. - Appendix. - New items and New tools. - Appendix. - difficulties and Pseudo-Problems approximately "Foundations". -Appendix.
The purpose of this publication is to discover technological know-how and expertise from the perspective of making new wisdom, rather than the reinterpretation of current wisdom in ever larger yet doubtful aspect. Scientists and technologists make development via distinguishing among what they regard as significant and what they think about as secondary or unimportant.
Full of interesting biographical sketches of woman engineers, this chronological background of engineering brightens formerly shadowy corners of our more and more engineered world’s contemporary earlier. as well as an in depth description of the varied arenas encompassed by means of the notice ‘engineering’ and a nuanced assessment of the advance of the sphere, the e-book contains a variety of information and suggestion upsetting proof approximately women’s roles within the fulfillment of exciting clinical ideas.
The century from 1750 to 1850 used to be a interval of dramatic alterations in international historical past, fostering different types of progressive switch past the political panorama. Independence pursuits in Europe, the Americas, and different elements of the realm have been catalysts for radical financial, social, and cultural reform.
- Evolutionary Theory and Human Nature, 1st Edition
- Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology)
- WORDS SCIENCE & LEARNING CL (Developing Science and Technology Education Series)
- Neurosis and Modernity: The Age of Nervousness in Sweden (History of Science and Medicine Library)
Extra info for A Companion to the History of American Science
ANTHROPOLOGY 27 Other Boasians went on to similar acclaim and success. Edward Sapir (1884–1939), like Boas himself a Jewish immigrant, became a foundational figure in anthropological linguistics. He conducted much of his early fieldwork in California, some of it with Kroeber’s informant Ishi, and in Utah, where he developed a close relationship with his own Paiute informant Tony Tillohash (Darnell 1990). On the basis of that work, Sapir argued that, psychologically, language and expression functioned differently across cultures, an approach he and his student Benjamin Lee Whorf expanded into a theory of linguistic cultural relativity (Koerner 1992; Whorf 1956).
Similar to MacKenzie’s (1991) triangular partnership, Rosenberg (1997) argues that the United States’ early success in agricultural research was a result of a three-way partnership between universities, experiment stations, and extension services. The last of these was established to disseminate research results, such as new crop types, machinery, and cultivation methods, to the larger farming community (Thompson and Noll 2014). These extension services are state-operated and focus on providing information on advances important within regional contexts, providing training for farmers in all areas of practical farm management, and on recommending efficient fertilizer levels.
Linguists and archaeologists increasingly worked in separate departments, while physical anthropologists, now rechristened biological anthropologists, took on research problems that were often disconnected from sociocultural anthropology. Even within cultural anthropology, theorists struggled to find common ground – all the more so when waves of poststructuralist theory and postmodern critique broke over the field, prompting anthropologists to rekindle debates about whether or not their discipline was indeed a science at all.